Enterprise uptime. Without the enterprise headcount.
Cloud infrastructure and compliance experienced, DevOps for medium, small business, funds and healthcare practices. 99.999% uptime maintained in current infrastructure work, one accountable engineer instead of a ticket queue.
Not projections, and not yet Madera Web Services client results: the operating record behind those results, run in production, in the roles that built it.
A disciplined approach to building and operating secure cloud infrastructure.
Every engagement follows the same operating model: align the business need, design the right architecture, automate what should be repeatable, prove it works, then transition it into an environment that can be operated and improved.
- A|AlignStart with the outcome.
Requirements, stakeholders, constraints, risk and what success actually means.
- D|DesignEngineer before deploying.
Architecture, security, resilience, recovery, cost and operational requirements.
- A|AutomateMake it reproducible.
Infrastructure as code, version control, CI/CD and AI-assisted workflows where they add value.
- P|ProveTrust evidence, not assumptions.
Validate security, monitoring, backups, recovery, performance and expected behavior.
- T|TransitionLeave it operable.
Documentation, runbooks, ownership, monitoring and a clear path for continuous improvement.
Nothing above shows up on a status page. Until it does.
An unpatched instance nobody remembers spinning up. A failover that's never actually been tested. A vendor who goes quiet the week your compliance officer asks for documentation.
None of it shows up on a status page. It shows up in a due-diligence questionnaire, or an incident report, at the worst possible time. That's the risk being carried every day by a fund too lean to justify a full-time DevOps hire, or a practice running patient systems on whatever the last vendor left behind.
Three ways to bring in enterprise infrastructure discipline, sized to what you need
Engagement model, not service category: for this buyer, how you commit matters more than a checklist of domains. A fund or a healthcare practice evaluating a vendor asks about scope, SLA, and exit terms before anything else.
The DevOps hire you don't have to make
Ongoing management: monitoring and alerting, IAM/RBAC administration, automated backup and disaster recovery, CI/CD upkeep, incident response. Scoped and priced like a fractional hire, not a break-fix vendor.
Audit, harden, document, hand off
A fixed-scope engagement built around a specific deadline: a fundraise, an audit, a migration. Infrastructure hardening, disaster-recovery build-out, cloud migration, compliance documentation and SOPs, delivered on a set timeline with a clean handoff.
A second set of eyes, before you commit to either
Architecture review, vendor and MSP evaluation, pre-audit readiness check. For teams not ready for an ongoing or project engagement yet, or who want an outside read before a bigger decision.
Proof, by vertical
For business that require regulatory compliance and can't afford downtime
Currently responsible for production Linux and Windows infrastructure supporting medium to small business and hedge fund clients across AWS and Azure: 99.999% uptime, IAM and Azure RBAC hardened for least-privilege access, and automated AMI/EBS-snapshot disaster recovery built specifically to cut recovery time.
For practices where downtime means a canceled visit, not a Slack message
Led facility operations for a multi-site healthcare organization: HIPAA, ADA, and OSHA compliance, MSP and vendor coordination, and IT upgrades executed with zero disruption to patient care.
One accountable engineer. Not a ticket number.
Every engagement runs on documented runbooks and incident-response procedures (not tribal knowledge held in one person's head) plus infrastructure as code, so the environment is reproducible without you. That discipline isn't new here: it's the same SOP-writing and system-monitoring process already built and run in production at a 365-day operation.
Where this is already heading
The same infrastructure discipline extends to the automated, AI-assisted workflows funds and practices are starting to ask about: reasoning, memory, and code execution, built on Amazon Bedrock and Claude. Not the reason to start this conversation. The reason it doesn't have to be the last one.
One call. Thirty minutes.
A systems review, not a sales pitch: walk through what's running today, where the exposure actually is, and whether it's worth continuing the conversation. If it's not a fit, you'll know within twenty minutes, and you'll still have gotten something useful out of it.
Or email Adonis@maderaweb.net
Not sure any of this is the right fit, or even what to call the problem? That's fine. Nothing above requires diagnosing it first. A slow site, a climbing AWS bill, a vendor who's gone quiet, a nagging sense nobody's actually watching the infrastructure: say what's happening at Adonis@maderaweb.net. This is just permission to use it before you're certain.